Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of two headspace sampling techniques for the analysis of off-flavour volatiles from oat based products.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Two different headspace sampling techniques were compared for analysis of aroma volatiles from freshly produced and aged plain oatcakes. Solid phase microextraction (SPME) using a Carboxen-Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) fibre and entrainment on Tenax TA within an adsorbent tube were used for collection of volatiles. The effects of variation in the sampling method were also considered using SPME. The data obtained using both techniques were processed by multivariate statistical analysis (PCA). Both techniques showed similar capacities to discriminate between the samples at different ages. Discrimination between fresh and rancid samples could be made on the basis of changes in the relative abundances of 14-15 of the constituents in the volatile profiles. A significant effect on the detection level of volatile compounds was observed when samples were crushed and analysed by SPME-GC-MS, in comparison to undisturbed product. The applicability and cost effectiveness of both methods were considered.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1592-1600
JournalFood Chemistry
Volume134
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Aromatic compounds
  • Cultivars
  • Flower volatiles
  • Headspace gas chromatography
  • Mass spectrometry
  • Model systems
  • Oatcakes
  • Rancidity
  • Retention
  • Solid phase microextraction
  • Tenax
  • Volatiles

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of two headspace sampling techniques for the analysis of off-flavour volatiles from oat based products.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this