Activities per year
Abstract
1.The use of nature-based solutions (NbS) in freshwater restoration must ensure fair, active, and transparent involvement of diverse stakeholders, and balance the distribution of costs and benefits they incur.
2.A synthesis of MERLIN NbS case study data, illustrated by six examples, shows that the way stakeholder engagement is designed and executed has critical implications for achieving such ‘just transformations’. The analyses focused on representation, procedure, and distribution.
3.Representation analysis shows that a broad range of stakeholders were engaged, but public-sector stakeholders often dominated, which may result from their traditional role in natural resource conservation and environmental protection.
4.Initiatives like case study boards and workshops promoted active stakeholder involvement, but community groups were often less actively engaged, reinforcing public-sector representation.
5.NbS benefits were generally well communicated and positively perceived, but there was limited clarity regarding costs, beneficiaries, and compensation schemes for affected stakeholders.
6.It is important to address the power dynamics and politics of restoration while building trust amongst stakeholders to galvanise support. Community groups and sceptical stakeholders need to be fully engaged and given space to voice concerns and to constructively find solutions. This requires significant time and resources. It also requires willingness to compromise.
7.Engagement and decision-making approaches should respond to different stakeholders’ needs, while ensuring flexibility to involve a range of stakeholders properly.
8.Capacity building for project leaders is critical to identify and address the root causes of opposition to NbS, low interest in participation and their implications for just transformations. This can help address low participation amongst some stakeholder groups.
9.To enable early detection of gaps and timely corrective actions, stakeholder engagement should be planned from the outset with tools in place to systematically monitor and evaluate participation.
10.Context is important, and each case study offers unique lessons, stressing there is no one-size-fits-all approach when implementing NbS within a just transformations framework.
2.A synthesis of MERLIN NbS case study data, illustrated by six examples, shows that the way stakeholder engagement is designed and executed has critical implications for achieving such ‘just transformations’. The analyses focused on representation, procedure, and distribution.
3.Representation analysis shows that a broad range of stakeholders were engaged, but public-sector stakeholders often dominated, which may result from their traditional role in natural resource conservation and environmental protection.
4.Initiatives like case study boards and workshops promoted active stakeholder involvement, but community groups were often less actively engaged, reinforcing public-sector representation.
5.NbS benefits were generally well communicated and positively perceived, but there was limited clarity regarding costs, beneficiaries, and compensation schemes for affected stakeholders.
6.It is important to address the power dynamics and politics of restoration while building trust amongst stakeholders to galvanise support. Community groups and sceptical stakeholders need to be fully engaged and given space to voice concerns and to constructively find solutions. This requires significant time and resources. It also requires willingness to compromise.
7.Engagement and decision-making approaches should respond to different stakeholders’ needs, while ensuring flexibility to involve a range of stakeholders properly.
8.Capacity building for project leaders is critical to identify and address the root causes of opposition to NbS, low interest in participation and their implications for just transformations. This can help address low participation amongst some stakeholder groups.
9.To enable early detection of gaps and timely corrective actions, stakeholder engagement should be planned from the outset with tools in place to systematically monitor and evaluate participation.
10.Context is important, and each case study offers unique lessons, stressing there is no one-size-fits-all approach when implementing NbS within a just transformations framework.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 49 |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Aug 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- Just transformations
- Social justice
- Stakeholder engagement
- Nature based solutions
- EU Green Deal
- Co-Creation
- Freshwater ecosystem restoration
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Just Transformations – Embedding stakeholder engagement in mainstreaming nature-based solutions within freshwater ecosystems. EU H2020 research and innovation project MERLIN deliverable D4.9.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Activities
- 1 Invited talk
-
Embedding governance and stakeholder engagement to mainstream Nature-based Solutions: Top tips from 19 European case studies
Ibrahim, A. (Speaker)
9 Oct 2025Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk
File
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver